Monsanto, Settlers Inadvertently Create New Superweeds
Over a decade ago, Monsanto made a supposed breakthrough. The idea was simple: sell both genetically-modified seeds and herbicide which would kill all other plant-life. It was marketed with great success to Amerikan farm-owners as a low-cost, high-output alternative to traditional agricultural methods. Critics called it “Frankenfood.” Now, Monsanto and Amerikan farm-owners are acknowledging one recent consequence of genetically-modified crops: superweeds.
Weeds, often those long native to the Americas, have long plagued Amerikan farm-owners. However, new superweeds are resistant to Monstanto’s herbicide, greatly diminishing the usefulness of their twin products, and in some cases grow much larger and quicker than their native ancestors. Farm-owners claim the evolution of superweeds has set their practices back by twenty years.(1) In a video from ABC News, a white guy explains the new weeds can damage heavy machinery while Blacks are shown in the fields doing manual labor.(2)
Monsanto claims a solution is only years away: newer genetically-modified seeds and stronger, sometimes older herbicides, such as 2,4-D, a main component of Agent Orange.(3)
On the surface, it’s hard to explain why Amerikan farmers chose to douse their field with stronger herbicides each year. Amerika is hardly short of food. The majority of the US population is overweight or obese, and around 40-50% of all produce grown in the US goes uneaten.(4) Neither are Amerikan farmers compelled by any feeling of altruism towards the masses of people who are underweight and genuinely malnourished throughout the world. That Amerikan farms overproduce food does little to help your average starving African.
In fact, the opposite is true.
As part of the globalized economy and along with subsidies Amerikan farm-owners receive (both in the form of vast amounts of stolen land and cash from the US government), local, largely autonomous economies have been undermined and destroyed. As a result, hundreds of millions of people have been kicked off of their lands, often their only means of day to day survival, resulting in greater food insecurity throughout the Third World. Exploiters’ quest for profits have caused great pain to the world’s masses. Superweeds are a minor problem compared to any number of plagues imperialism has unleashed.
Imperialism is a system which can not rule without destroying local communities, traditional economies or global ecology. While the world’s masses may never recover everything exploiters have stolen or destroyed, a new world can be built, free from this menacing system. It is out of the ashes of a world imperialism is destroying that the struggle for a mutually and equally beneficial order can emerge victorious.
While over the long run this struggle will benefit humanity in its very ability to survive, the task of building a new world rests mainly on those exploited by imperialism, who have “nothing to loose but their chains.” This group resides mainly in the Third World. At most, a small minority from imperialist First World countries will line up to fight on the side of revolution. Nonetheless, the exploited and their allies must press forward, facilitating the destruction of imperialism and creating of a new, revolutionary global society. Despite everything imperialism has thus far stolen or corrupted, it will be the people who own the future.
2 responses to “Monsanto, Settlers Inadvertently Create New Superweeds”
These European settler colonists are the ultimate “superweed.”
They are guilty of the greatest land theft and greatest genocide in human history.
More outrageous is their attempt to disguise their crimes behind lies about spreading liberal democracy, freedom, and Western “civilization.”
These European colonizers are a predator class, and should be exposed and then dealt with as such.
This is typical of the united $nakes’ metaphysical approach to science. The bourgeois scientists at Mon$anto consider it possible, and desirable, to grow only a single type of plant in a field, and “kill all other plant-life”. That foolish thought stems from their overarching desire to maximize profits. They unscientifically consider their genetically modified seeds and toxic chemicals in isolation. Then they’re surprised when some weeds develop a resistance to their celebrated poisons and emerge all the stronger in the absence of competition.
Socialist agriculture, by contrast, starts from the dialectical principle that changes in one part of the system will affect other parts as well. To a socialist scientist, the emergence of “superweeds” in the united $nakes was entirely predictable. Rather than trying to engineer nature to support monoculture, we socialists strive to meet the needs not only of people but also of the ecosystem itself. Thus we would never apply chemicals designed to kill all plants other than one of our choice.